You can’t keep talking about sins in this conversation. I’m sure religeon has already made its rules about abortion but this is government we are talking about. The government and the church must remain seperate, because not all people in America, for example, practice the same religeon. Religeon is somethhing that individuals choose to follow and if a person follows a religeon that does not accept abortion, then they will not abort due to their faith. But you cannot force that faith into others. You seem very interested in making everyone follow the rules of the precious bible, but it doesn’t work that way. We have to make decisions from a logical standpoint that will work for the nation as a whole. Also, we have to think about the woman as well, since in the end she is the one who has to carry the baby 9 months, give painful birth to the child, and most likely provide for the child for 18 years or so. Is the child’s life more important than the rest of the mother’s life? Considering that 16 year olds get pregnant, I think that 16 is too young to throw your life away but having a kid you can’t support – at least in current American society it is. I believe that abortion before the heart begins to beat is ideal, because at that point it cannot be considered murder, and because at that point the cluster of cells has just as much right to live as the other 10,000 eggs in a woman’s ovaries that NEVER become fertalized.

I fully agree with you.

Exactly. Everyone deserves the right to live!

A rational society does not make laws for the convenience of law breakers..I mean..an illegal act should at no cost made legal just because people might suffer while breaking the law..

If we let poeple decide for themselves what the definition of SIN is..

Then we should legalize rape..the rapist might not consider that as a sin..

We should legalize murder..the murderer might not consider that as a sin…

Is that what you want to say???

That’s totally absurd!!!

So you mean that an innocent child having a physical defect does not have the right to life??

That isn’t plausible at all..

You must not be killing a baby because u “think” there is “a possibility” he might suffer in the future and you can’t even be sure about that.. That child might have a physical defect, but you can never know…someone with only one leg can become a brilliant mathematician for example..

If abortion is legalised in respect with these lines of thought then even murder of the millions already born handicapped persons should be legalised.. That’s absolutely absurd!!

No one has the right to take the decision about life or death..

In my point of view, legal abortions only encourage incest.
The solution that pro-abortionists offer to the problem of incest is to allow the man who man this girl pregnant to take her down to the nearest abortion centre for a secret abortion. they then pat her head and say, “see honey, problem’s all taken care of”. He can then drive her home and continue the abuse, with the inscriminating evidence neatly disposed of.

You will not end incest by allowing the abuser to destroy the evidence.

Moreover, i think abortion for rape is killing an innocent child because of the crimes of her father.

In my point of view, legal abortions only encourage incest.
The solution that pro-abortionists offer to the problem of incest is to allow the man who man this girl pregnant to take her down to the nearest abortion centre for a secret abortion. they then pat her head and say, “see honey, problem’s all taken care of”. He can then drive her home and continue the abuse, with the inscriminating evidence neatly disposed of.

You will not end incest by allowing the abuser to destroy the evidence.

Moreover, i think abortion for rape is killing an innocent child because of the crimes of her father.