Mauritian College Girls Who Do Tube Lubricating Service
Yesterday we heard that two teenage guys have been arrested because they had s*x with two other teenage girls. It’s the law and I agree to it but why the guys and not the girls? The law protecting children (supposed to be) in Mauritius is pure nonsense then!
So the story is that two college guys were busted by the cops along with their girlfriends at the Belle Mare beach. The two guys are from 17 to 19 year old while the two girls are 15-year-old. The Mauritian law says that any person found having s*x with a girl under 16 is liable for judiciary charges.
I already hear you saying that the guys merit it since they went against the law. Right? But here is the best part of the story. The two girls in fact LIED to their parents saying that there would be a special student meeting at the college that afternoon. The girls then went to the beach with their two boyfriends.
As the sun made its way further west, the girls phoned their parents to inform that they would be stuck with an urgent group work and would be back home the next day. Great American Pie story right? But where were the girls?
They were in fact enjoying on the beach at Belle Mare with the two guys and even opened up their holes for the big pump to pump the scream out of their ***** under the tent! — Oh how rude of me!
Cops who were patrolling the region, heard the “p0rn movie like sound” and went to have a look and caught the two couples on spot. “Oh lame moment to come in cops”
Now the two guys are busted while the two GOOD and INNOCENT girls are at home. But how and why?? Both girls were in need of some male heat(Oh yea!) and orga$m! They LIED to their parents to get f*ck on the beach. They screamed and enjoyed the 0rga$m to the max. They wanted it! But it is against the law. So the goddamn law must act but why busting only the guys?
Who supplied the holes to enable the insertion of the c0cks?! The President’s wife’s daughter’s neighbor? If the law need to act it needs to also see who provided the other side of the story. Saying this, it is often seen in many of those dumb teenage s3x case where the girl want it, she beg for it and after getting her dosage of the male reproductive juice, she feels weird and then complain to the cops. And who get busted? The guy! And women talks about equal rights? But if rights are to be equal it needs to be equal for both!
This post is not against women or girls but it is in fact to point out the flaw of the system and the wh0ry behavior of some teenage girls who beg for s3x and then make a whole scene out of it. If the law need to punish (with a fine of course..not prison), then it needs to do it for both girls and boys!
If the boys were the smoke, the girls were the fire!
Edited by Kurt Avish on Oct 13, 2009 | 8,980 views
Sign
up to Island Crisis free email delivery now! Get all latest updates!
|
Loading ...
New blog post: Mauritian College Girls Who Do Tube Lubricating Service http://bit.ly/7APYA
[Reply to this comment]
Injustice nou pa ler !!
[Reply to this comment]
Kurt Avish Reply:
October 17th, 2009 at 10:20 AM
@Joyshan, LOL
[Reply to this comment]
hahaha…..
This seems to be a joke specially in a country where everybody is talking equality of opportunity…
If there was anything as such then both parties should have been arrested as the girls were not yet adult and the also they the accepted to be part of the beach party (lol) by lying to their parents.
[Reply to this comment]
Kurt Avish Reply:
October 13th, 2009 at 1:05 PM
Exactly. It’s weird how the law does not see the obvious fact that girls of 15 nowadays are no more kids. They know WELL what they do.
[Reply to this comment]
It’s because of their age. If it was the other way around (the guys that were underaged) it would be the girls that are arrested. The law makes it that the circumstances of the case are irrelevant. If someone has s3x with another who is underage, it is them who is committing a wrong. The law cannot assume that the girls ‘wanted it’ (as you so put it! :p), you can’t rule out the fact that the girls were misled or put under pressure to lie to their parents.
You’ve seem to make this article personal, it needs a little more objectivity!
.-= Nav´s last blog ..The End of TV? =-.
[Reply to this comment]
Kurt Avish Reply:
October 13th, 2009 at 1:12 PM
Hmm..well ya its a bit more like a blog post than a news this time
– Ya coming to what u said, “”If it was the other way around (the guys that were underaged) it would be the girls that are arrested.”" — I wonder if this will hold true HERE in Mauritius. The cases are almost inexistent here to have a guy go to complaint at the police that an older girl showed him how to craft children on bed lol.
The pressure part..I dont agree. A 15 year old girl in Mauritius is no more a 15 year old girl her of the 1990s.. These girls know very well what they were doing and how come the “pressure” factor comes in? – Well one example of the pressure factor could be “si to pa vini mo pu kit toi” lol.. but who is so dumb to go with these reasons in 2009? (Amoin si tifi la un mari gopia femel mem :p ).
I;ll continue to reply yr comment below in reply to Bruno..
[Reply to this comment]
Nope, children have the right of irresponsibility before the law. Even if she wanted it, the boy should never have eff-ed with her cause she is under 16. Plain application of the law. For the 15 year old girl, bein la loi dans so cote. Peut rien faire and according to me it should not be changed
.-= Bruno´s last blog ..C’est l’hôpital qui se moque de la Charité =-.
[Reply to this comment]
Kurt Avish Reply:
October 13th, 2009 at 1:16 PM
Compare a boy of 18 year old and a girl in Mauritius of 15 year old. Who do you think is more mature and wiser at decision taking? THE GIRL. It is a fact! – I AM NOT SAYING THE BOYS ARE NOT GUILTY.
The guys are guilty too and need to pay the applicable fines whatever but the girls too are guilty. Come on, are these 15 year old girls like 5 years old girls to be so naive and innocent that they dunno what they were doing. And THE WORST they even know how to make a perfect plan to fool their parents to spend the time at the beach (at night en+) with their boyfriend.
We need to stop just putting the blame on one side. These girls might be minor, but they know very well what is the 0rgasm they appreciated under the tent! So why only the guys need to be blamed. I think BOTH should pay the fines. The law also need to revise itself as the 15 year old girl of the 1990s and the 15 year old girl of 2009 has a vast difference when it comes to decision taking and thinking.
[Reply to this comment]
Nav Reply:
October 13th, 2009 at 1:34 PM
‘Compare a boy of 18 year old and a girl in Mauritius of 15 year old. Who do you think is more mature and wiser at decision taking? THE GIRL. It is a fact! – I AM NOT SAYING THE BOYS ARE NOT GUILTY.’
I have to disagree with you (again). I don’t think it is a question of who is wiser, you’re making it as if boys are stupid :p. If you compare the scenario of the same situation of a girl of 13 years and of a boy of 21 years. Here you will obviously say that if a s3xual relationship exists it is the boy who is guilty, and the girl is totally innocent. The problem is that the law cannot say “oh if there is a big enough age gap it is illegal”. There has to be a strict age, a strict rule where it becomes an offence. That age is 16. I understand, and agree to a certain extent, that yes perhaps the girl knows perfectly well what she is doing and what the consequences are. But, the 17-19 year old guys KNOW that what they are doing is illegal.
Even if she was 15 years and 364 days old, she is under 16 and it is an offence.
I don’t think the age that having s3xual intercourse should be lowered. If the law was change to make it legal for 15 year olds to have s3x more 15 year olds will have s3x and teenage pregnancies will go up. I think it also crosses morality issues too. well, imo anyway
.-= Nav´s last blog ..The End of TV? =-.
[Reply to this comment]
Kurt Avish Reply:
October 13th, 2009 at 1:52 PM
No I never said boy are stupid. We are guys afterall
However its true girls tend to reach mental maturity faster than guys during teen age.
No I never said we need to lower the age limit lol.
Infact the law is good as it is for 16 year old…what I want to say is that having s*x is done by two at minimum. So if there is a punishment by the law for it, it should be for both. We can’t say the girl is a kid and she didnt know what she did. The law must be for both UNLESS there is a condition which prove that the girls were FORCED or BLACKMAILED to do so.
But if both agreed to it, then both should be responsible and not only the guys.
nand Reply:
March 2nd, 2010 at 12:09 PM
@Nav,
hi me i think personally the law should have been such that only those independent that is not dependent on thier parents should be allowed todo s3x… that is earning doing jobs etc
doing it without independency cause a great p[roblem to parents.. they are stressed why their children are away from home till late.. where are they? etc.. difficult to intervene if they fall pregnant as abortion is illegal..
difficult if the guy doesnot assume his responsibility..
for those independent, they can rear the child alone and take responsibility…
Besides,, the major reason i think is the stressful life parents are living,, as if day by day they are dying…
Dude, you do forget one thing. THIS is Mauritius (in the tone all Liverpool fans know…
) ! Police and all have nothing to do to these girls, its just like that but you forget the “social law”, the “madam zanlouis law”. The whole town where these girls live will soon know who they are and it will also be the talk of the college. In no time, it’ll be the talk of all the colleges in Mauritius, then their parents will make them pay for their deeds. Reste dan lacaz ou bien marié vit vit! Welcome to Mauritian society.
.-= Web Design Bureau of Mauritius´s last blog ..Are Mauritians that bad at design? =-.
[Reply to this comment]
Kurt Avish Reply:
October 13th, 2009 at 1:18 PM
Kan zot marier bizin indike laho la tent mariage….”Under Tent Experienced Specimen”
[Reply to this comment]
Nabiilah Reply:
October 15th, 2009 at 2:02 PM
@Web Design Bureau of Mauritius,
i think this is the best comment …. btw its true that both girl & boy should pay for their misconduct irrespective of their age (Minor) as long as its not a rape case.
Nowadays girls are much more exited than boys ,so i don’t understand why the boys should take the entire responsibily when they both enjoy the good times together.
[Reply to this comment]
“It’s the law and I agree to it but why the guys and not the girls?”
Tout simplement parce que les filles étaient mineures mais pas leurs petits amis.Il serait par contre très intéressant de savoir si une chose similaire arriverait à des filles de plus de 18 ans qui auraient des rapports sexuels avec des mineurs de moins de 18 ans…
.-= Guiblog´s last blog ..Ramgoolam clôt l’affaire Valayden =-.
[Reply to this comment]
Kurt Avish Reply:
October 13th, 2009 at 1:21 PM
And if it was the inverse “pa ti pu ena tou sa grimace la” — Paski tou le deux in gagn bon kan in fer emba la tent…mai puiske beze in leve aster..zot met tou lor garcon..
“‘Nooo Nooo we didnt want this. We were just revising the reproductioooon system of Biology”…
[Reply to this comment]
Mauritian College Girls Who Do Tube Lubricating Service – Island Crisis (blog): http://bit.ly/sJVC0
[Reply to this comment]
Well the the guys got stuck simply because the gals were minor. NOthing can be done for them koz we are binded by the law. Just to bad for the guys.
Doesnt mean that the gals got nothing to do in the picture?
Btw it is not a crime to have s3x as well. The way the issue has been pictured it seems that havin s3x is a sin.
Anyways it is because Mauritius is still very a conservative country.
On the assumption that the girls parents accepted that their kids have a bf … pas ti pu ena tous ca cinema la.
Normally parents hate to hear that their girls have bf. Just too bad. At this age teenager wanna know more and it result in havin s3x in tents,
The issue as such is not only about the s3xual aspect, there is culture, upbringing and all behind.
I am not saying everyone should have sex at 15.
Some are ready to do at 15, while other need to wait.There should be nothing as such as a taboo on the s3xual issue.
The problem are not the teenagers, the problem of parents who give their kids acces to internet , mobile and all but at the end of the day they wanna remain traditional.
Have had the parents walked with this era, like letting the gals meet their bf , of course give a specific time to come at home and all.
Teenager would not feel stucked in the Mauritian culture.
There is a clash of generation.
.-= priscus´s last blog ..Mauritius Arranged Marriages =-.
[Reply to this comment]
Kurt Avish Reply:
October 13th, 2009 at 4:24 PM
No I do not have any problem with girl having s*x. If they wish to do it and both partners are fine with and even take the precautionary measure, then there should be no problem. (Well there is the cultural aspect now). People will of course gossip when a girl of 13 do it.
The point that I don’t like in this case is when the girls want it and even go for it, they wont complain before doing it. They will enjoy it but then after having the dosage, they’ll either make a whole scene out of it and then its the guys who are in trouble. But why even do it at first?? They should think about the post-s*x well before doing it (or BEGGING for it as it is often the case!).
[Reply to this comment]
nand Reply:
March 2nd, 2010 at 12:13 PM
@priscus,
sometimes parent do not know wat their children are doing outside. they even give them a time to reach home but the stubborn children never listen
they come late each time lying, inventing stories….
[Reply to this comment]
@Kurt Avish
” We can’t say the girl is a kid and she didnt know what she did”
Then at what age can you reasonably say that a ‘girl is a kid’ if not younger than 16?
“No I never said we need to lower the age limit lol”
If you don’t lower the age limit (according to your argument), then at what age does someone stop being a kid and is punishable for having s*x? If you cannot give a strict answer to that then you’re indirectly saying that anyone who is under 16 can be arrested for having s*x. And that’s a big problem.
And this is why 16 is chosen as the limit
.-= Nav´s last blog ..The End of TV? =-.
[Reply to this comment]
Kurt Avish Reply:
October 13th, 2009 at 4:19 PM
In my personal opinion I don’t think a girl of 15 or 16 upward does not know what is s*x and does not know what she is doing. Maybe her vision of having s*x is different from a more mature girl of over 18 but yet we can’t use the Naive and Innocence fact to say that ONLY the guys were wrong in doing so. I wanna be clear here…I am not saying the guys are not wrong. I am saying BOTH are wrong so BOTH (guy and girl) should pay the fine.
I can’t really give u an age where I’ll qualify a girl as a kid as it differs in different countries but also about the factor we are talkign about. Here we are talkig about Mauritius, Factors: Year 2009, A Form 5 student and also the opinion about s*x factor. So considering these factors, I’ll say if the girl would have been 13 then maybe we could have said that the guys fooled the girls and whatever. Again this is my opinion and this age value can differ from others opinion. But then we’ll also have to consider the age of the guys if the girls were 13 or less…
Saying this, does not mean that I am saying that girls above 13 can have s*x. What I wanna say is if the 15 year old girls know how to have s*x and even made up such a perfect plan to spend time at the beach, we cant keep saying the guys are only at fault. (Un lot zafer…c ban fam la ki excite ban garcon lol
— purely macho statement just for fun … no offence
)
The 16 limit is ok…my argument is why only the guys. Now lets assume if they guys and girls were both 15 what would have happened? NOTHING. So just because the guys are 2 years elder than the girls in this particular case,s o it is such an horrible case.
[Reply to this comment]
Nabiilah Reply:
October 15th, 2009 at 2:11 PM
@Nav,
i still believe that minor should not have s*x … because girl not always wanna have s*x they do it just becoz they wanna keep their boyfriend .after that the guy leaves for another then they realise they made a mistake by doing it with the wrong person…. too late so sad
“Virginity is like a ballon one its prick its gone 4ever.”
[Reply to this comment]
for me the law is what it is
but if they are caught making s*x although they are teenagers
why must they be punished????
internationally it is not forbidden
why must it be in mauritius then?
i agree that mature people shuld not have s*x with teenagers
but among teenagers its not a crime
it all depends on themselves and that they shuld assume all the consequences by themselves
not the law to decide
and why only boys the culprit???
bane tifi la gain envi fr apres zis garson ki pay lepocasser
it is INJUSTICE
[Reply to this comment]
Nabiilah Reply:
October 15th, 2009 at 2:13 PM
@curpen,
NO i completely disagree read what i said earlier Teenagers should not have s*x COZ THEY AREN’T MATURE ENOUGH TO DECIDE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[Reply to this comment]
We talk of equal opportunity act. But acting in an opportunity with girls breeds danger. Girls wanted to have sex with boys but it the boys who got tt pay fore it. That is not fair. The law discriminates in favour of girls. This is a loophole in the law . It has to be amended by our famous Attorney at Law Hon Rama . Oh Rama Rama!!!!
Will definitely bring him some votes and sympathy.
.-= drreddy´s last blog ..Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam (SSR) First Prime Minister of Mauritius =-.
[Reply to this comment]
Kurt Avish Reply:
October 17th, 2009 at 10:21 AM
@drreddy, Lol at “Oh Rama Rama”
[Reply to this comment]
The guys, the 2 gurls and the policemen are all to be punished !!!
So you ask why the POLICEMEN. The cops have entered the cinema without paying the tickets and on top of that they have watched a p0rn “movie” live and arrested the actors and actresses. The question remains, were they n*de or what?
LOOOOOOOOOL
They are lucky
These hot teens wanted to have s*x on the beach but they ended to have s*x under the tent. Zot ti p gagne frais avec labrise ki ena labas. Bon banne zen faire attention next time.
[Reply to this comment]
Kurt Avish Reply:
October 17th, 2009 at 10:21 AM
@Lopez, Ah this is one cool alternative point of view. Maybe the cops liked it too lol
[Reply to this comment]
V S Reply:
February 5th, 2010 at 8:58 PM
moi si mo ti dans place la police la, mo ti pu rod n role dan film la. lol
[Reply to this comment]
S*x eDUCATION IS VERY IMPORTANT IN OUR SCHOOL . COLLEGES AND UNIV…We have a moral obligation to protect the most vulnerable group of people in our society. Children are still children if trhey are under 16 , and if the state law say so , so be it.
Our society will go down the drain if the diversity issue of the national socila fabric is not looked at.
Parental responsibilities , parents must be questions and prosecuted if they cannot looked after their children , They must be accountable for their childrens act.
Religious values, faith , culture , where are these thesedays.
EVERYONE , beit a boy or girl who have S*X with a mineur must be prosecuted not necessarily imprisoned or put on a s*x offenders list , but, must be on the list of the social services and they are monitored closely.
[Reply to this comment]
Nabiilah Reply:
October 15th, 2009 at 2:14 PM
@rajking, Very well said!!
[Reply to this comment]
all these discussions are not going to reach to anythjing…..
so lets answer 1 question first.:
Had both parties been under the age of 16 then who would have been arrested?
(a) the BOYS
(b) the GIRLS
(c) both of them
(d) none of them (which would have been normal according to the law)
[Reply to this comment]
FRANK Reply:
October 17th, 2009 at 1:49 AM
@kounal, If both parties had s*xual intercourse despite the girl consent the guy will still be prosecuted. According to the law , consent regarding s*xual intercourse (it should involve penetration) cannot be provided by someone who is under 16. Moreover, it also covers an indecent act .
The article above is an insult to the English Language.It is a fiasco in terms of grammar and vocabulary.
[Reply to this comment]
Kurt Avish Reply:
October 17th, 2009 at 7:51 AM
Sure. Next time we’ll write as if to participate in an English Language Vocabulary Competition. And what if you are an insult to the Creole Language?
No offence but a blog is a blog, and I do not write here to show my English Writing Talent.
[Reply to this comment]
FRANK Reply:
October 17th, 2009 at 9:23 AM
@Kurt Avish, This is not a personal attack against your character as a human being. Moreover ,I find it mind boggling to understand in what sense am I an insult to the creole language. My point is not to discredit your article. You have a great story with some amazing facts which is just being told in a chaotic fashion. May be if you take a few steps backwards and stare at your article , you will notice a profound lack of maturity. I am thoroughly aware that a blog is a blog , a dog is a dog , a toilet is a toilet etc. However, that does not mean you should write in such an unstructured way because by doing so you run an enormous risk of being called a fool lacking credibility. One last thing, I think writing be in English or any other languages is not a talent but a skill.:) . You have the skill so use it.
Kurt Avish Reply:
October 17th, 2009 at 10:00 AM
Hello Frank. In fact I’ll take back my words from my previous reply to you because I think you were right. I wrote this particular article with anger and irritation that I didnt notice those mistakes. (You know at times even a blogger get angry with things happening around lol ) – After reading your previous comment, I cross checked the article again and I guess you as well as Priscus who also told me the same thing, were not wrong. (I admit I didn’t even cross check it before publishing even though I was told by some other friends that I was biased and rude in this one
)
No sincerely when I am re-reading this, I think I am reading Perez Hilton blog lol – Anyway thanks for reading and I take your comment as a constructive criticism instead
– Keep in touch
FRANK Reply:
October 17th, 2009 at 5:47 PM
@Kurt Avish, I am glad you have taken my comments in a positive way. You are doing a fantastic job by providing insider news and provoking debates which are not mainstream unlike some longstanding newspapers such as Le Mauricien or L’express. Keep up the good work dude and all the very best !
Kurt Avish Reply:
October 17th, 2009 at 10:23 AM
@kounal, In Mauritius none of them would have been arrested.
[Reply to this comment]
Maybe you are unaware of that, but, this kind of prehistoric dumb law is not limited to Mauritius, even the US, UK and Japan have laws like that…there are many cases where only the male party is arrested, even though its consensual, even though the girls lured the boys over, even though the girls lied, even though, in some cases, both the boy and the girl are underage…
Some girls lose their virginity at 14 to other 14-15 yrs old boys[ I'm not defending underage wh0res and guys with no brains here, but, lets move on...].
These police guys should just have cared about their own business and not arrest a bunch of students for having s*x [Again, this is not limited to Mauritius]..
Hmmm…I’m curious though…what would have happened if no one was underage and the police barged in while they were…euhem, ‘poking’…
BTW, congratz for that lame shopped pic…^^
[Reply to this comment]
Kurt Avish Reply:
October 17th, 2009 at 10:24 AM
@Kuro, I think then the cops would have arrested them for shooting a p0rn movie on the beach lol
[Reply to this comment]
mauritius is pure nonesense, you said it man!
[Reply to this comment]
I love to read the creole version of the reports sounds more interesting
[Reply to this comment]
after their work the cops went home and had surely a great time of pleasure without needing help from their respective wife
[Reply to this comment]
@Nabiilah,
ya i agree..
new married couples do separate becoz the girl was not a virgin
even today that happens
[Reply to this comment]
I agree to some extent with Kurt Avish…Of course those guys should be punished for they knew the girls were underage and blablabla…But still lets not say that those girls are not old enough to know what they were doing…Common when you were 15,you did a lot of shit,but still you knew that it was some bad stuff..They should be punished by the law too..Do some social work,clean the street..lol
If I were the parent of these girls…Jezzzzzz I would give them a spank and they wouldn’t be able to sit on their ass for a long timeeee…!!
.-= LOocifur´s last blog ..My Last Cigarette =-.
[Reply to this comment]